Critical communication issues in Knowledge Management implementation

Inside Knowledge magazine talks to Andréacascade process should never be underestimated.
Thompson about the change management issuesIf the programme has support from the highest
surrounding KM.level then employees are far more likely to take
The knowledge that exists within yourit as a credible management initiative driven from
organization is your only sustainable source ofthe top. If the management team do not present
competitive advantage. We believe this makesa unified front then the programme has little hope
knowledge management a strategic imperative.of succeeding. Sponsors should give visible support
But how do you ensure that your KM initiative isas often as possible in terms of face-to-face
effective, that it delivers on its promises and thatteam meetings, editorials, quotes and feedback.
your organization sees a return on its KMWhen working with GSK on the introduction of a
investment?global project management improvement
Change communications and engaging employeesprogramme (Apex), sponsorship was key to
is a critical part of this process and in thissuccess. It was visibly supported at the highest
interview we talk to Andréa Thompson,level and the programme director made it a
Managing Director of Marmalade Consulting aboutpriority to consistently rally advocates by keeping
some of the key communications issuesall senior management informed and involved at
organizations face in implementing KM. every step of the process. This was done on a
Q. What are the key change-management issuesface-to-face communication level supported by
that organisations need to address when lookingappropriate communications tools. This process
to develop a KM programme?ensured they were motivated and enthused in
A. The key change-management issues are:terms of cascading information through to their
committed support from the top, the need forteams. I have rarely seen a better example of
companies to put KM at the heart of theirthe impact senior-management buy in can make.
business strategy, introduce measurement toolsNot only was the programme director fully
and recognise the importance of engaging withcommitted to making it happen but the director
target audiences through a comprehensive andwas also given the resource and budget to do it
robust communications plan.properly.
Large companies tend to be composed of 
specialist units (commonly known as silos) andQ. How important is the process of obtaining
therefore no one person has a clearfeedback from those the KM programme will
understanding of the overall corporate objectivesaffect?
in terms of what a KM initiative should achieve.A. In our experience, talking to the people who will
Organisations need to bridge the gap betweenbe affected by the programme is essential.
‘doing’ and ‘acting’. KM is aBefore starting work on any KM programme,
culture shift that transforms the way theemployees’ opinions should be gauged to gain
company does business. It is about encouraginga better insight into their needs and expectations
cross-functional working and improving individualand they should be encouraged to contribute
performance for the benefit of the employee, theideas. In this way they feel involved from the
company and ultimately the customer.outset and they will have an awareness and
 anticipation of the programme well before the
Q. Do you think organisations looking to implementlaunch. Once issues are understood, benefit-led
a KM programme have paid enough attention tomessages can be introduced to address them.
these issues in the past?Feeding back the feedback is just as important. It
A. Definitely not. We have a work culture that isis critical to understand any ongoing issues so that
information rich but most definitely knowledgeany shortfall or drift can be addressed. We have
poor. Companies need to define clear principles forexperienced situations where research with
KM rather than hold a mass of data that servesemployees has been carried out but they have
little purpose in growing the business.had no follow- up communication so why should
In my experience one of biggest barriers tothey bother next time round?
success is the failure of senior management to 
understand the value that informed internalQ. How important is it that KM is integrated with
communication can bring. By all means focus onexisting work practices and not made a separate
process but don’t forget the emotionalfunction in its own right?
experience. It is your employees whoseKM should never be a separate function but the
knowledge you require and they are the onesmanagement team should be mindful of the
that will make it happen – if you cannotexisting processes used by the company. What
engage your audience you have little hope ofare the lessons learnt? Are these practices useful
improving operating performance and little chanceto our way of working? And, importantly, are
of success.they the future of the organisation?
 A. Many existing KM or project-management
Q. What can a well thought-outprogrammes are introduced on a
change-management strategy bring to a KMproject-by-project basis, not in the context of a
programme?wider, properly developed ‘vision’. The
A. Success. Stakeholders need to establish aKM vision should strive towards a good practice
common recognition of the change required,and self-development programme that is linked to
agree the benefits of a clearly defined KMthe organisation’s long-term corporate
approach, establish a process to support it andobjectives. In which case they must be assessed
define what level of support is required to make itand abandoned if not required. The best of the
happen. KM needs to become part of the culturebest should be taken from existing programmes
and ‘the way we do things’.and incorporated into the new working practices.
 The KM programme of the United Health Group, a
Q. What techniques can organisations use to helpprivate health-insurance company in the US,
increase acceptance of changing workingcombined five good-practice methodologies
practices?together in the same system. Taking the best
A. There is no prescriptive method and nofrom the best and pulling it together to make one
perfect way to communicate change. However,common good-practice toolbox that would be
whatever the method, communication has aintroduced as a mandatory way of working for
critical role to play in gaining the acceptance andinternal employees and also external consultants.
participation of employees. There are many 
frustrations regarding methods of communication.Q. What are the most common pitfalls relating to
Inevitably you can’t please all the people allchange management that organisations need to
the time, but there are some fundamentals thatavoid when attempting to implement KM?
can be addressed. One overriding factor is thatA. One of the most common pitfalls is to hand
communication is vital for a successful changeover the project to IT. KM should be viewed as a
programme. key asset because it is a lot more than
Many different channels can be used from atechnology. Stop viewing it as a process tool and
simple CEO memo through to full-scale stagedbegin to think of it as a culture change, which
event and getting the balance of communicationshould be driven and supported from the top until
channels right is extremely important. The mostit becomes second nature.
important aspect is to segment the audience andAn IT system is an enabling tool that facilitates
target messages and channels appropriately andsupport. The purpose of KM, however, is to
consistently over a specified time period.encourage faster and smarter working, built on
The overall lesson for communication is that thethe sharing of good-practice information and
‘closer’ you can get to the individual theknowledge that will benefit the individual, and
more effective communications will be –ultimately the company. Individuals need to
hence the importance of the cascade process andrecognise how it benefits them before they will
face-to-face delivery. support it. It is worth bearing in mind that the
People need to be listened to during times ofmost powerful persuasion tool is self-interest.
change more so than usual. One-to-one meetings 
with managers should be seen as a critical part ofQ. What are the likely consequences for
the process. In difficult times, spokespeople areorganisations that continue to neglect the
listened to more than ever, so it is essential thatchange-management aspects of knowledge
all messages are co-ordinated and that themanagement?
company speaks with one voice. A leader’sA. In large organisations, in particular those who
behavioural can make the different betweenare less asset focused, KM is fundamental to
success and failure. growth and profitability. If companies do not
For example – the knowledge steward: Werecognise the importance of change management
worked with Innogy One, the engineering divisionin this area but continue to introduce systems on
of Innogy (now RWE Energy), on the brandinga project-by-project basis with no consideration
and communication of a knowledge-managementto the wider company strategy, then effort will
initiative. There was a small, dedicated team tocontinue to be duplicated and the opportunity to
ensure the successful implementation of thecapture intellectual capital will be lost.
programme and knowledge stewards were 
introduced into the process. The knowledgeQ. Are there any other issues that you feel
steward was someone who was not onlydeserve closer attention?
supportive of the KM principle but was alsoA. Having a well-conceived programme is one
experienced in the business and, importantly, achallenge; making people aware of it and want to
good networker.use it is yet another.
This ensures that positive messages are beingEngaging the internal audience through
relayed to the team in which they operate andcustomer-focused communications can contribute
also other departments across the division. Thisenormously in this process. In the outside world
works successfully on two levels: it begins topeople will only buy something they think is worth
break down the silos in which so many companiesbuying, the same principles apply to our internal
operate and it brings together dedicatedcustomer.
champions from each department on a regularIn my experience, employees successfully adopt
basis to share experiences and ideas. In effect,this type of programme when it is well branded
they become the communication lynch pinsand promoted. The Apex initiative for
through which everything is funnelled, creatingGlaxoSmithKline is one such example. Apex
consistency and commitment.(Advancing Project Expertise) is a well-planned
Another important aspect, and one that hassystem but to help its success we applied the
worked for GSK and the United Health Group, isrules of branding. The programme has a name, an
measurement. It should be a key part of theidentity; a visual appeal and targeted
process to provide simple feedback loops ensuringcommunications that were key to helping achieve
people’s concerns are listened to andheightened awareness and outstanding success.
addressed.A strong brand can encourage employees, it can
 provide a framework, common link, direction and
Q. How important is senior-management buy-in incohesion, and a shared sense of purpose and
encouraging the adoption of new workingunified attitude. It is a very powerful tool in the
practices?persuasion process.
A. The importance of strong leadership and the