Does Military Leadership Translate to the Business World?

Several of us were standing around a tableapproach as well; usually with the same results.
discussing the good and bad of young people inIn a Harvard Business Review blog post last year,
the workplace. When a member of the groupColonel Tom Kolditz, a professor at the U.S.
complained that his young workers were not asMilitary Academy, wrote that good military
productive as he wished and just didn't seem toleadership is based on the values of duty, service,
be able to "get it," I suggested a technique to leadand self-sacrifice. These are the qualities of a
these people through mutual understanding ofgood leader, whether in the military or civilian
mission and goals and helping the youngersector. It is the leader who understands their duty
workers learn as a method of engendering loyalty.to the organization; who knows they are serving
I mentioned that, in some ways, older generationsthat organization and the people in it; and who is
have abdicated a responsibility to teach, optingwilling to sacrifice their own desires for the
instead to change our behaviors to meet theirgreater good that will be successful.
desires. One of the members of the discussionIn my military service I was twice in unusual
immediately referred to my military experiencesituations where I did not have the normal legal
saying that it was easy in the military to make(or financial) sledgehammer, but still had broad
people do what you want them to because theyresponsibilities to accomplish a specific mission. In
have to obey. He professed that it wasn't asboth cases I had small staffs (most of whom had
easy without military law as an overriding threatno particular requirement to follow me, at least
to non-compliance.not in the normal military sense) but national, and
That statement was at once correct andeven international, responsibilities for which I had
incorrect. Correct in that military members dono real authority. I found in both cases that one
have a legal obligation to follow orders anddidn't need brute force to accomplish goals. By
superiors often have legal remedies totreating people with respect, learning their needs
non-compliance. Incorrect in that the legaland motivations, and doing my best to meet
sledgehammer is a very ineffective and inefficientthem while ensuring we all accomplished the
way to obtain loyalty and effective behavior fromoverall mission, we were able to meet our goals
subordinates.and move the entire organization forward.
Yes, I've known military leaders who accomplishThe military services have learned that a leader
their goals through the brute force of legalwho works to understand and inspire his or her
authority. Sometimes they are successful andsubordinates will be more successful than a leader
some even make it to the top ranks of thewho relies only on the brute force tools that may
service. However, more commonly they stall outbe available. They also understand that the troops
somewhere because that approach alienates theirneed a leader who will stay with them; who
subordinates and does not engender the sort ofunderstands and shares their hardships. No not all
loyalty that makes an organization excel. But, I'vemilitary leaders get it. But, the good ones do.
also known non-military leaders who use this