Identifying Candidates for Leadership

A critical task in the succession planning processanswer is, "It depends."
of any organization is identifying candidates.Recruiting from outside the organization makes
Traditionally, candidates have been identified basedsense when a major change in corporate culture
on past performance. While this seems logical, it isor direction is needed. But, I would caution about
problematic in practice.the over-dependence on outside recruiting of
Past performance always measures success in aleaders. Desperate attempts to recruit leaders
lower-level position. What is needed in successionfrom outside the organization suggest an
planning is a system to identify potential forinadequate leadership pipeline.
success in a future higher-level position. The bestRecruiting leaders from the outside of the
predictive model I have found is the Leadershiporganization can be very expensive. As we all
Pipeline Model by Charan, Drotter, and Noel.know, there is a talent shortage in the
The Leadership Pipeline provides a model thatmarketplace. This can lead to paying high
describes the skills, time applications, and valuespremiums (or even outright price wars) for
required to succeed at different levels in thepromising talent.
organization. While most leadership models andThe Leadership Pipeline Model offers a common
theories describe characteristics of leaders inlanguage (terminology) and specific criteria for
general, the Leadership Pipeline describes specificwhat to look for in leaders at the next higher
criteria for success in transitioning from one levellevel. The Model provides a description of the
to the next.skills, time applications, and values required of
The Leadership Pipeline Model helps us to see theleaders at each successive level. This criteria is
importance of identifying candidates for positionscritical not only for identifying candidates but also
throughout the entire organization. The pipelinefor their subsequent development.
must be continuously filled with leaders who haveThe key to identifying candidates for higher levels
been identified for development for the nextof responsibility is to predict their potential to
higher level. A pipeline clog at one level will clearlysucceed in attaining and using the skills, time
harm leadership development and successionapplications, and values of the next higher level.
throughout the entire organization. What is neededPast performance is often a poor predictor of
is a carefully monitored system for developingfuture success. Remember that the skills, time
in-house talent from front-line supervisors toapplications, and values of each successive level
CEOs.of leadership are dramatically different.
At GE and Citicorp, two companies using theThe challenge in succession planning and identifying
Leadership Pipeline Model, leadership passagescandidates is making sure people are assigned to
from one level to the next are seen as "turns" ina level that is appropriate for them. The challenge
the leadership pipeline. These turns (or passages)is complicated by the fact that people change
provide significant developmental experiences. If(hopefully for the better) over time. An
these turns are skipped the individual may not beappropriate position for someone today may not
prepared for higher-level leadership positions. Thebe appropriate three years from now.
focus for development should be the lack ofIdentifying candidates for the organization's future
critical skills and values for the next higher level,leadership positions is a critical task. Do you have
not past performance.a system for identifying candidates that considers
I am often asked "Is it better to recruit fromnot only their current skills, but also their
outside the organization or to develop leaderswillingness to adopt new work values and time
from within?" The safe, but rather uninsightfulapplications?