Leadership in 2010 - Where Have All the "Pattons" Gone?

Overviewpositive reinforcement and redirection of their
Over the last months I have been asked multiplecore strengths. Negative feedback, well articulated
times, in interviews for various media, what theand delivered carefully, can be very helpful. What
difficult economic times have done to changethis tool seems to do, however, is make leaders
leadership. I am not sure that the times haveafraid to make anyone unhappy. They lose
changed the demands of leadership as much asthemselves and their direction in trying to please.
they have magnified our weaknesses and areasIn fact, one of my most talented clients was told
for improvement.by the person handling her 360 that the most
We are often unaware how our cultures haveimportant thing she could focus on was making
actually diminished the very things that we thinkpeople "like" her. He clearly indicated that this was
of when it comes to leadership. Strong, brightmore important to do than to get the results.
individuals have been taught not to be too strongReceiving a 360 is a bit like walking into your
or too bright, lest they draw negative attention.office and finding an unsigned, nasty note. You
We talk endlessly about effective communicationmight learn and grow from the experience, but
and yet, our communication skills seem to bethe odds are higher that you will feel wounded
deteriorating with the heavy influence ofand betrayed. There simply is no substitute for a
performance reviews, 360s and other means offearless HR person who has been well-trained in
evaluating emotional intelligence as well as jobsuccessful ways to give feedback to very strong
effectiveness. George Patton simply would notpersonalities. While the 360 is a popular tool and a
survive in most of our sophisticated corporatetrend, it is an excuse for not doing what we
cultures. He would at the very least, have to goshould do in the first place.
underground.New skills
Have we gone the wrong direction? HaveSo where is the skill deficit that we need to fill?
teamwork, collaboration, and "playing nice"How do you teach people to say exactly what
replaced leadership? I personally believe wethey are thinking without hurting or damaging
needed to move in the direction of treatingothers? That's the skill set that needs to be
people with more respect. I do believe that weevolved, and it is a very powerful tool.
have failed to evolve our teaching ofI work daily with senior executives who find
communication skills along with our understandingthemselves at a loss when it comes to the
of "emotional intelligence". We have clearly told ourcommunication issues they have with others.
leaders what they cannot do, but we have notThey are afraid to be themselves because they
replaced the old Patton style of authority with ahave been chastised for being too blunt, too
kind of direct and effective communication "skillabrasive, or too harsh. Otherwise they are simply
sets" that allow leaders to be clear.too indecisive. They cannot win.
I have watched strong leaders who have muchWhat they find is that if they can get in touch
to share being hammered into ineffective,with the impact of what they "feel" in the
unhappy, tip -toeing shadows because they simplyinteraction, and if they can find the ability too
do not know how to be strong, clear, and at thecommunicate that effectively, they once again
same time, "correct". The bullies are still thrivingare able to influence the outcome.
because they have gone underground withSound overly simple? I have clients, very talented
subversive, passive aggressive behaviors. Ourclients, who have been battered by subversive,
talented leaders no longer know how far they canpassive aggressive bullies. When they learn that
go, how far the organization will support them andthey can turn the tide by making things public and
how much they need to acquiesce in the interestsaying exactly how the interaction is making them
of "team".feel, they are once again empowered to LEAD.
It is not "new" thinking to acknowledge that ourBefore they figure this out, the bullies can push
leaders need more courage and more skills forthem around. And we lose them as effective
fighting against short term, expedient thinking.leaders.
However, rather than articulate and pontificate onWhat other skills do we need to build to help our
these needs, we must help the leader removeleaders be strong in a feedback happy
REAL obstacles to behaving in the way that mostenvironment? We need to help them understand
would prefer.that technique is not enough. They must learn
Any skill teaching in the arena of authenticity,that to manage communications effectively, they
courage, judgment, etc, must include anmust manage the energy of the communications.
understanding of and adjustment for what gets inWhat does that mean? It means that we need to
the way of good people automatically behavingdive a level below what we normally teach in
according to their values. How do we help ourcommunications. We must understand that the
leaders find their voice when it appears to beenergy of the communication will tell you much
against their best interest to do so?more about its effectiveness than the leader's skill
Leadership and the 360 degree performancewith language. A leader who understands how to
reviewfeel and manage the energy will be ten times as
For the last ten years I have been putting giftedeffective as one who is simply clever with his or
leaders back together after their 360her words.
performance reviews. I'm appalled at what ILet me be specific. If a leader is communicating a
believe to be the inherent flaws in such a processdirection or policies, or decisions to his/her
and I am sickened at the damage they do toorganization, and if the organization has just
everyone and to our notion of leadership.experienced lay offs, it is a more complicated
Seemingly a brilliant concept (anonymouscommunication than if things are great. The leader
feedback from the main people who arewill be conscious of the need to manage the fear
impacted by a leader's style), they are ultimatelythat the message may convey. This is a fairly
damaging to the leader and the organization.common focus for a leader managing a tough
Specific flaws:situation.
1. The methodology offers the poor performersWhat if every communication has an attached
an unchallenged voice. It is often used as anenergy that must be managed? If a leader was
opportunity to "get back" at a leader who hasevolving his/her skill set, he or she would need to
given performance feedback to someone whobecome much more conscious of the underlying
has failed to meet expectations. The leader doesenergies, and would need to learn technique for
not get to defend himself or herself from thisguiding them effectively. If someone needed "rails"
anonymous feedback, and yet it is weighedthe skillful leader would know this intuitively and
heavily in the performance of the leader.would provide stronger parameters. If a person
2. "Anonymous" brings out mean spiritedwas out of control and disrespectful, the leader
responses, again, from those with an ax to grind.would know that he had to push back (and he
There is something unhealthy in telling someoneshe would know just how hard to push back).
that they can say whatever they want and noIn other words, a leader would become
one will ever be able to hold them accountable.extremely adept at reading the energy of a
Sanctioning a tool that promotes passivesituation, knowing exactly how much finesse, or
aggressive behavior simply makes no sense.force was needed, and he or she would trust
3. My clients typically know exactly who made theenough to act on what they knew. The leader
most negative comments because theywould not allow situations to travel too far along a
inadvertently say it in a way they have said itnegative trajectory because he or she would
before. The fact that they say it in a formal,know the implications. In other words, leaders
documented process does not improveneed to learn skills that give them desired
relationships or teamwork.outcomes, and they must then learn to trust
4. The weighting of the feedback is alwaysthemselves enough to apply those skills in the
toward the negative. That does not mean thatface of potentially negative feedback.
there are more negative than positive comments.In summary, our leaders must learn new and
It means that the person is forever haunted bymore sophisticated levels of communication by
the mean things that are said. Rarely are thetapping into the right brained, intuitive side of the
people who have just been zapped by a 360 ableprocess of interacting. This will be particularly
to remain objective.difficult for highly analytic, left brained leaders and
5. The mechanism does not promote learning orour teachers must be trained in how to help them
growth. Typically people learn best throughdo so.