Strategic Project Management - A Competitive Advantage

Recently, a number of the world's leading projectdown, decomposed into a series of projects.
management organisations have taken majorTherefore, you need to be good at doing project
initiatives to enlighten executive managementmanagement to deliver the strategy. Now, the
about the strategic importance and benefits ofliterature says that for an organisation to be good
project management. The focus is to move fromat doing projects it has to: put in project
individual project management to organisationalmanagement procedures, train people on how to
project management, which these organisationsapply/do project management and co-ordinate
maintain is a strategic advantage in a competitivethe efforts of the people trained to work to
economy.procedures in and integrated way using the
In this article, Ed Naughton, Director General ofconcept of a project office. Does taking those
the Institute of Project Management and currentthree steps deliver a competitive advantage for
IPMA Vice President, asks Professor Sebastianthis organisation?
Green, Dean of the Faculty of Commerce andProf. Green: Where project management, or how
Professor of Management and Marketing atyou manage projects, becomes a source of
University College Cork (formerly of the Londoncompetitive advantage is when you can do things
Business School), about his views of strategicbetter than others. The 'better than' is through
project management as a vehicle for competitivethe experience and judgement and the knowledge
advantage.which is built up over time of managing projects.
Ed: What do you thing strategic ProjectThere is an experience curve effect here. Two
Management is?organisations will be at different points in the
Prof. Green: Strategic project management is theexperience curve as to the knowledge they have
management of those projects which are ofbuilt up to manage those bits of projects where
critical importance to enable the organisation as athe rule book is inadequate. You need
whole to have competitive advantage.management judgement and experience because
Ed: And what defines a competitive advantage,however good the rule book is, it will never deal
then?completely with the complexity of life. You have
Prof. Green: There are three attributes of havingto manage down the experience curve, you have
a core competence. The three attributes are: itto manage the learning and knowledge that you
adds value to customers; it's not easily imitated; ithave of those three aspects of project
opens up new possibilities in the future.management for it to become strategic.
Ed: But how can project management yield aEd: Well, then, I think there is a gap there that
competitive advantage?has to be addressed as well, in that we have now
Prof. Green: There are two aspects to projectdeveloped a competency at doing project
management. One aspect is the actual selection ofmanagement to do projects, but we haven't
the type of projects that the organisationaligned that competency to the selection of
engages in, and secondly there is implementation,projects which will help us to give this competitive
how the projects themselves are managed.advantage. Is project management capable of
Ed: Competitive advantage - the importance ofbeing imitated?
choosing the correct projects - it isn't easy toProf. Green: Not the softer aspects and not the
define which projects should be chosen!development of tacit knowledge of having run
Prof. Green: I think that the selection andmany, many projects over time. So, for example,
prioritisation of projects is something that hasn'tyou, Ed, have more knowledge of how to run
been done well within the project managementprojects than other people. That's why people
literature because it's basically been assumedcame to you, because while you both may have
away through reducing it to financial analysis. Thea standard book such as the PMBoK or the ICB,
strategic imperative gives you a different way ofyou have developed more experiential knowledge
prioritising projects because it's saying that somearound it.
projects may not be as profitable as others, butIn essence, it can be imitated a certain amount of
if they add to our competency relative to others,the way, but not when you align the softer tacit
then that's going to be important.knowledge of experience into it.
So, to take an example, if a company'sEd: Organisational project management maturity
competitive advantage is introducing newmodels are a hot topic at the moment and are
products more quickly than others,closely linked to the 'experience curve' effect you
pharmaceuticals, let's say, getting product tomentioned earlier - how should we view them?
market more quickly, then the projects thatProf. Green: I believe in moving beyond painting by
enable it to get the product more quickly tonumbers, moving beyond the simplistic idea that
market are going to be the most critical ones,an organisation is completely plastic and you can
even if in their own terms, they do not haveimpose this set of procedures and skills and text
higher profitability than other sorts of projects.book protocols and that's all you need to do. In a
Ed: But if we're going to select our projects, weway, exactly the same problem was experienced
have to define what are the parameters orby the developers of the experience curve. If
metrics we're going to select them against thatyou show companies the experience curve on
give us the competitive advantage.cost, it's almost as though, for every doubling of
Prof. Green: Absolutely. The organisation needs tovolume, cost reductions occur without you having
know which activities it is engaged in, which areto do anything. What we know is though, that the
the important ones for it competitive advantageexperience curve is a potential of a possibility. Its'
and then, that drives the selection of projects.realisation depends on the skill of managers.
Organisations aren't very good at doing that andEd: Are senior executives/chief executives in the
they may not even know what those activitiesmindset to appreciate the potential benefits of
are. They'll think it's everything they do becauseproject management?
of the power system.Prof. Green: Until recently, project management
Ed: If a company formulates its strategy, thenhas promoted itself in technical terms. If it was
what the project management community says ispromoted in terms of the integration at general
that project management is the medium formanagement, at the ability to manage across the
delivering that strategy. So therefore, if thefunctions lending technique procedures with
organisation is good at doing project management,judgement, then it would be much more
does it have any strategic advantage?attractive to senior managers. So, it's about the
Prof. Green: Well, I suppose that comes back toblending of the hard and the soft, the techniques
this issue of the difference between the type ofwith the judgement and the experience that
projects that are chosen and the way youmakes project management so powerful. If senior
manage the projects. Obviously choosing the typemanagers don't embrace it at the moment, it's
of projects depends on being able to link andnot because they are wrong. It's because project
prioritise projects according to an understandingmanagement hasn't marketed itself as effectively
of what the capability of an organisation is relativeas it should've done.
to others.Ed: Do we need to sell to senior executives and
Ed: Let us assume that the strategy is set. Inchief executives that it will deliver competitive
order to deliver the strategy, it has to be brokenadvantage to them?