Stress Management - A Critical Factor of Successful Corporate Change

Everyone is placed in situations that requirea manager on an organisational level.
changing their lifestyle, thought patterns and jobIn an organisation each level, from senior
environment. For some these changes happenmanagement through to support staff must be
regularly. For some they happen rarely. But oneevaluated for their ability to implement and solidify
thing is for sure, change ALWAYS causes stresschanges required. Often, management recognize
at varying levels. Handled correctly it can be madethe fact that "something" is going wrong, but
a pleasure and a source of personal and grouphave no idea how to fix the problem. Experience
pride. The current surge in professional changeshows that this level is so engrossed in the day
management in companies requires some carefulto day running of the business from a technical
consideration as to the effects of that stress onand corporate governance perspective, they
the individuals and their organisation.ignore the fact that the organizational organism is
Our world has created enormous changes overmade up of people.
the past 50 years. The resultant stresses areIt is a mistake to believe that individuals can just
causing serious mental and physical health issues"role with the punches" and accept any change
that in turn translate into huge economic cost atfoisted upon them. It is also a mistake to try to
personal, business and government levels. Byuse hard sell techniques to convey the need for
handling the PERCEPTION of the change properly,change. These techniques do not work and never
a great deal of needless anxiety and serioushave. Those people may have widely varying
consequences can be avoided. The perception ofvalues systems and the resultant conflict creates
change and its expected outcomes must behigh levels of anxiety, anger and depression in
understood by the individual at an unconsciousorganizations, leading to low productivity,
level in order for the stresses to be reduced to asubstantial staff turnover and high illness levels.
minimum. This is a very different process toThe illnesses are no different to the problems
presenting the need for change only at apresented to me on a daily basis as a therapist
conscious level and expecting the individual'sand stress management consultant.
memory and values system to accept it.From experience, it is often high stress levels in
The perception that personal change is differentmanagement brought on by perceived
to organisational change is erroneous. Both haveperformance expectations that must be dealt
the same effect if handled wrongly, but ultimatelywith first. Without clear direction and planning and
an organization behaves in exactly the same waycommunication, major changes can be seen as
as an individual undergoing change. The only real"the straw that broke the camel's back" in middle
difference is that in personal change the stressmanagement. This often undermines the success
arises from conflict between ill informed parts ofof introduced change in an organisation.
the mind, while stress in organizational change isA good Change Manager is fully aware of these
derived from conflicts between parts of theissues at a personal level and puts in place
organization (other minds). Where both partseffective strategies to handle the potential fallout
conflict at a personal level and parts conflict at anfrom large scale change before the change is
organizational level occur, very seriousimplemented. He/she then must monitor the
consequences will be displayed.entire process until the individual and organisation
In both situations the Values System of theare back in a stable environment. By doing this
individual parts needs to be recognized and inlarge potential losses can be avoided and the
some cases modified before stress levels due todesired result from the change will be seen
change can be reduced. Using very advancedsooner in the bottom line.
techniques of modality evaluation, we can nowOnce the risk assessment has been completed
identify possible conflicts before a change regimeand a customized organisational development plan
is put into place, reducing the potential forhas been agreed upon, the plan is implemented in
disharmony and personal stress. The economicthe following order:
benefits of this become apparent when you1. Senior management is coached in what to
consider the real cost of illness and staff turnoverexpect and how to respond to challenges and
of an organisation.resistance to the suggested change.
Handling of both personal change and2. Second tier management is trained in the
organisational change needs to consider therequirements for introduction of new systems or
individuals in a change process as individuals. Thistechnologies so that they are seen by staff to be
involves understanding a number of factorscongruent with the companies outcomes and are
including:o Values systemso Ability - technical andpart of the implementation.
learningo Previous history of changeo Reaction to3. Training sessions for each group of staff
historical changeo Perception of proposed changeomembers is implemented in a way that does not
Perception of work colleagueso Perception of thedisrupt day to day business to a damaging
individuals place in the organisationo Ability todegree. This training takes into account the
integrate technology changeo Assessing theintelligence gathered about these groups and their
inherent culture of an organisation points not onlylikelihood to resist the change, accept a move in
to the historical development of the organisation,company policy or efficiency or become part of
but also to the management style and socialan overall fostering of renewed pride and security
interaction in place.in a congruent corporate environment. This
The second most important component oftraining is supported by regular communications to
handling change includes an assessment of:o Whatall staff on the progress and especially in the
extra commercial risks are introduced through thechange in customer or other stakeholder's
change.o The real need for change to occuro Theperception of the reinvigorated company.
speed with which change needs to occuro Based4. Systems and technologies are implemented in a
on the past history and expectations of staff, willstaged process and level of acceptance and
the change be seen as positive or negative fromintegration is monitored by the change
their point of view?o Does the change involvemanagement and senior management group.
technology upgrades that will require higher skill5. Additional training and communications are
sets?o Does the staff expected to integrate theadded as required to cement the change and
technology change have the capacity to do so?omake it a permanent factor in the company.
Will effective training staff be available to transferIt is important through all of this that potential
skills required?o Will the company or organisationincreases in stress levels be monitored and
provide the resources to ensure the educationreacted to in a confidential way for all staff. Done
process required by individuals PRIOR to changecorrectly, a properly designed and implemented
being implemented?change program will reduce the risk of abnormal
Given an understanding of these factors, a goodstress blowout and increase productivity by
change manager will be able to develop a highlyinducing a higher level of pride in the company and
effective custom program to implement any kindincreased work satisfaction at all levels of
of change. This applies whether the change ismanagement and staff.
implemented by a therapist on a personal level, or