The Role of the Machine Metaphor in Mixed-initiative Organizational Leadership

"Can This Marriage be Saved?" So reads the titlecolumn for the Twentysomethings in the July 17,
of the cover story in the August 15, 2005 issue2005 issue of the Washington Post, Career Track
of BusinessWeek ( The article describes thesection, Mary Ellen Slayter wrote about why
seven-year (1998-2005) story of the merger ofyoung professionals resist the offer to move to
Daimler and Chrysler Corporation. As of thismanagement. "I am not good at managing people"
writing, the board of the merged companiesis the reason provided by a 49-year old lady for
decided to terminate the reign of the currentresisting the offer. In defending the new
chairman, Jürgen Schrempp. At the end ofDepartment of Homeland Security's merit pay
this year he will be replaced with Dieter Zetsche,system, Clay Johnson III, the Deputy Director of
the current head of the company's operations inthe Office of Management and Budget asserts
North America. The article identifies the following"The Federal government as a rule is pretty bad
five critical challenges facing the new chairman:about managing people" (Washington Post, National
1. Improving product quality and worker morale.News, July 19, 2005).
2. Securing union support to gain flexible laborThis mindset of people management is
agreements.entrenched in our social and organizational
3. Impressing on company executives to promotesystems. It is very important for organizational
flexible and productive operations in Northleaders to know that machine control techniques
America.apply to things, not people. Except for the military,
4. Developing and executing a more coherentwe manage things. We lead people. The role of a
partnership strategy in Asia.manager is to provide a rich and rewarding
5. Addressing investor pressure to break up theenvironment to enable workers to do their work.
merger.A human being is an agent in an organizational
The five challenges listed above clearly show thatcontext. This agent's behavior is unpredictable.
more people related problems (i.e., social issues)The agent must interact with other human
will need to be addressed than technology issues.agents, within a team, whose behavior is also
The new chairman must embrace aunpredictable. The team must interact with other
mixed-initiative leadership style with ateams in a department. Next, we have
proportionate focus on both the technical andinter-departmental interactions, which can lead to
social aspects of the organization for theinter-divisional interactions, and so on. The result
company to survive. This leadership styleof the interactions is a complex organization,
demands some proficiency in the science ofwhich must adapt to its environment to survive,
complexity (i.e., the principles of managing thebecause the organization is a living system. As
organization as a complex adaptive system) andarticulated by Richard T. Pascale, Mark Millemann,
the machine metaphor (i.e., the routine aspects ofand Linda Gioja in their book: Surfing the Edge of
modern organizational life--job descriptions,Chaos, (Random House, 2000), as a living system,
corporate policies, strategic and operational plans,the organization must abide by "the laws of
etc.)*. Organizational leaders cannot afford tonature and the new laws of business".
place disproportionate focus on the machineWhether managing a corner store or a global
metaphor in a complex organization.conglomerate, the manager/leader must always
The Machine Metaphorremember that an organization is a socio-technical
The machine metaphor takes an objective viewsystem and the machine metaphor should be
of an organization in which the interactions amongapplied only to the technical or machinistic
the elements are predictable and controllable.elements. To ensure the survival of the
Given that premise, organizational leaders take acorporation, the leaders need to identify and
mechanistic view of organizational management.understand those elements of the organizations
The mechanistic view considers the organizationthat exhibit unpredictable behaviors, and those
as a combination of manageable components withelements whose behaviors are predictable. They
organizational charts, job descriptions, policies,need to master and apply the management
operational plans, people, etc. The machinescience of complex adaptive systems to the
metaphor is based on an organizationalformer and machine metaphor to the latter.
management belief that effective managementThese two approaches constitute the essence of
can be realized by managing all organizationala mixed-initiative perspective.
components.*(Plsek, PEP&A, Inc; Lindberg, VHA, Inc;
The Flawed "People Management" MindsetZimmerman, York University; 1997--Some
In some instances, this metaphor is incorrectlyemerging principles for managing in complex
applied to people management. In her adviceadaptive systems).