Thoughts on Leadership

Today, modern corporate organizations faceappropriate style depends upon two types of
compound pressures driven by competition, talentsituational factors: the characteristics of the
finding and retention, globalization, financialfollower and the characteristics of the
expectations, technology innovation, energyenvironment. Three of the most important
trends, diverse workforces, environmentalfollower characteristics include the locus of control,
sustainability, corporate responsibility, theauthoritarianism, and personal abilities. The three
proliferation of the Internet, etc. The bottom lineenvironmental factors include the nature of the
is that maintaining the status-quo or doingtask, the formal authority system within the
marginally better is not a formula for success.organization, and the group norms and dynamics
Change management and adaptation is ever more(House et al. 259-273).
necessary to be able to set direction, to identifyVroom and Yetton's "Normative Decision-Making"
priorities, to manage complexity, and to delivermodel is also a situational leadership theory since it
exceptional results.identifies the appropriate styles leaders should use
John Kotter, Konosuke Matshushita Professor ofin making decisions. The three leadership styles
Leadership at Harvard maintains that "Most USinclude autocratic decision making, consultative
corporations are over managed and under led." Indecision making, and group decision making. The
essence, today's managerial jobs requiredecision titles determining which style is most
management and leadership skills with varyingappropriate include such questions as whether the
degrees of focus. The higher we go on theleader has adequate information to make the
corporate ladder, the greater the demand fordecision alone, whether the subordinates will
leadership ability. Thus, the increasingly fastaccept the goals of the organization, whether
changing environment we face requires moresubordinates will accept the decision if they do not
leadership from more people. To cope with theseparticipate in making it, and whether the decision
forces good mastery of leadership andwill produce a controversial solution (Vroom 278).
management skills is essential in order to marshalAlthough most of the literature on leadership
and manage any organization effectively. Hence,emphasizes the influence of the leader on the
the great need to institutionalize leadershipgroup, the influence of the group upon the leader
development. "Institutionalizing a leadershipshould not be overlooked. The relationship
centered culture--where the business rewardsbetween the leader and the group implies a
people who successfully develop leaders--is thereciprocal influence. Groups have the capacity to
ultimate act of leadership." (Kotter 51-65, 1999).influence the behavior of their leaders by
Leadership Differs from Managementresponding selectively to specific leader behaviors.
Webster's Third New International DictionaryThe influence of a leader can also be constrained
defines leader as "a person who by force ofby several external factors, such as organizational
example or qualities of leadership plays a directingpolicies, group norms, and individual skills and
role, wields commanding influence, or has aabilities. Other variables have been found to
following in any sphere of activity." The strengthneutralize or substitute for the influence of a
of leadership comes from the enrolment of mindsleader, such as the skills and abilities of followers
to a common cause or vision, and the release ofand the nature of the task itself.
intrinsic motivation to achieve extraordinaryManaging Breakdowns for Breakthrough
results. This means that anyone in an organizationPerformance
can be a leader, whether or not that individual isIt is difficult to predict with certainty that the
formally identified as such. Indeed, informal leadersattainment of future visions will occur without the
are extremely important to the effectiveness ofoccurrence of some setbacks. Breakdowns are
most organizations.situations where the team realizes that the
Allen Scherr and Michael Jensen (2-4) offered incurrent plan won't work. Contrary to the general
their recent Barbados Group Working Paper thatbelief of people, breakdowns can be turned into
"a leader is an ordinary human being with both athe driving force behind breakthroughs. This
commitment to deliver a result--whose realizationconcept is well captured with the saying:
would be remarkable and visionary given the"necessity is the mother of invention".
current circumstances--and the integrity toBreakdowns are opportunities for a truly
execute on this commitment to accomplish thecommitted team to find alternate solutions; this
desired results." One key idea of this definition isonly happens by identifying the problem and
that "integrity" in the sense of leadership includesworking on it as a team. Expanding on the
honoring your word--and that means eitherbreakdown notion, there are two essential
keeping your word or acknowledging that one willelements to every breakdown: 1) the
not be keeping it, and cleaning up any mess thatcommitment and 2) the recognition and
causes for those who were counting on thatacknowledgment that, given the current course
word being kept." (Erhard et al. 36).and speed, the commitment will not be realized.
Kotter defines management as being about copingFirst, if there is no commitment there will never
with complexity, planning and budgeting, organizingbe a breakdown; because in the absence of any
and staffing, controlling and problem solving. Tocommitment, whatever happens is acceptable. So,
this end, he asserted that management involveswhen there is no buy-in and commitment is
setting targets and goals, establishing detailedunclear or vague, the existence of a breakdown
plans for reaching goals, allocating resources,will lack urgency, and may not even be visible to
establishing organizational structure, delegatingsome or all of the people involved. Second, to the
authority and responsibility, monitoring results vs.degree that one can accurately predict the
plan, identifying deviations from plan, and planningoutcome of the present course, breakdowns will
and organizing solutions (51-65, 1999).be identified earlier, and thereby increase the
Consequently, what great managers have inlikelihood that the issues will be resolved. On the
common is an appreciation of their strengths asother hand, to the extent we cannot see that the
well as an understanding of their limitations. Beingforecast of the present approach is failure, no
aware that performance hinges on how well theybreakdown will be noticed or, if it is, it will likely be
figure out the pressures and priorities of theirtoo late to overcome the obstacles (Scherr, Allen
particular job, they find a course that works for13-14).
them. According to Sternberg "finding this individualThe act of managing and communicating the
path to success is the hallmark of managerialexistence of breakdowns helps to expedite the
intelligence." (314-315).timely finding of new solutions and breakthroughs.
Management is fundamentally about minimizing riskIf everyone is committed to the same overall
and maximizing adherence to plan andvision, then a breakdown in another area that will
predictability. In comparison, leadership copes withprevent the overall vision from being realized is a
the unknown, the dreams, and the vision thatbreakdown for all. When a committed and
generates breakthrough performance. Accordingly,motivated team faces a breakdown, they
what one person views as possible may be a pipere-create their commitment instead of giving up.
dream to another. The subject of leadership isRenewing the commitment shifts people's
one where the results to be produced arepoint-of-view and often allows them to see
accompanied by greater risk and uncertainty thanopportunities and solutions that were not
what is normally considered to be acceptable inpreviously visible.
the realm of management. A scholarly gem ofThe quality movement offers methodologies (e.g.,
the Renaissance was Machiavelli's The Prince (1513Lean Six Sigma, ISO 9001, TQM, CMMI, ACE, etc.)
1962). Machiavelli's thesis is as good today as itto help with the identification of some type of
was in 1513. It declared that "there is nothingbreakdowns by checking what is not broken and
more difficult to take in hand, more perilous tofinding ways to drive continual improvement.
conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than toBringing in a fresh perspective to observe what is
take the lead in the introduction of a new order"business-as-usual" can help to spot breakdowns,
of things."which may have been invisible otherwise.
Obviously, both leadership and management areExpectations + Commitment is the Dialect of
vital for a well-functioning organization. It is criticalSuccessful Leadership
to emphasize and understand Kotter's incisiveExpectations and commitment play a central role
conclusion about the tensions between leadershipin the effectiveness of leadership. It is known that
and management: ". . . even more fundamentally,leaders who expect more typically get more (e.g.,
leadership and management differ in terms ofLikert, 1961, 1967; McGregor 1960). By inviting
their primary function. The first can produceeach relevant individual to make a personal
useful change, the second can create orderlycommitment to the realization of the vision, a
results which keep something working efficiently.leader is in practice working towards a self-fulfilling
This does not mean that management is neverprophesy. The main implication of creating the
associated with change; in tandem with effectivePygmalion effect by expecting committed players
leadership, it can help produce a more orderlyto excel is to drive high performance.
change process. Nor does this mean thatEden (184) points out that "a leader who wants
leadership is never associated with order; to theto be a more positive Pygmalion should point out
contrary, in tandem with effective management,to the subordinates that they have much
an effective leadership process can help produceuntapped potential, and in general get them to
the changes necessary to bring a chaotic situationbelieve that they can achieve more." Business
under control." (Kotter 7, 1990). This conflict canschools teach many variation of this theme to
be useful; however, it is not a trivial exercise.develop leadership skills, i.e., Expectation and
Proper balance is essential for both short-termSelf-efficacy Training, Immunizing against the
and long-term success of any business.Golem Effect, Avoiding Negative Stereotypes,
Leadership is about being comfortable withClearing the Record, Setting Challenging Goals and
change, and understanding that the status quoObjectives, etc.
works against progress in most cases. EveryCulture of an organization is closely involved in the
quarter and every month, there is change--thingsrealization of expectations and self-fulfilling
are in constant motion. While others may not beprophecies. Schein (189-190) has researched how
aware of this, leaders assume it. In knowing thatculture impacts the effectiveness of an
change is inevitable, the true leader seeks positiveorganization. In his own words, "productivity is a
change for a purpose and for the better. Kottercultural phenomenon par excellence, both at the
defines leadership as consisting of the followingsmall-work-group level and at the level of the
three elements: 1) establishing direction, 2) aligningtotal organization." To this end, myth making is a
people, and 3) motivating and inspiring them. Thispromising way of molding organizational culture.
is a great definition but the paper of Allan ScherrManaging myths is a worthy cause for those
and Michael Jensen, adds further insight into theinfluencing the culture "...the unique and essential
domain of leadership by agreeing with Kotter'sfunction of leadership is the manipulation of
work but adding two more elements:culture." (Schein 317).
"Communicating breakdowns, and managingThink about the encouraging self-fulfilling prophecy
breakdowns." (Scherr, Jensen 4).aroused by the wide spread belief that "Nothing is
Legendary leader, Jack Welch remarked in a WSJimpossible" or that "Will is the measure of power"
editorial (2004) that after 30 years of leading hecompared to the Golem effect that comes from
knows what leaders look like and act like. Hismyths such as "Our products lack quality" or that
process assesses four essential traits (each one"We operate on Murphy's law and the Peter
starting with an E, a nice coincidence): 1) greatPrinciple". Therefore, symbolic expressions of a
positive Energy, 2) ability to Energize others, 3)high achievement culture are important in the
Edge or the courage to make tough yes-or-noenhancement of expectations.
decisions, and 4) Execution follow through to getBusiness as usual is often the enemy of
the job done. He concluded his assessment withbreakthrough performance and effective
an observation about integrity and generalleadership. When things are very bad, the need
intelligence as necessary attributes to completefor change is pushed in our faces. When a
the profile of a strong leader type.situation is unbearable, it seems that taking action
As we gather, there is no shortage of leadershipis the right thing to do, and most are willing to
definitions. The many dimensions into whichwork hard at it. However, when things are good,
leadership has been cast can make the subjectwell hey, everything is fine. The problem with
ambiguous. Nevertheless, there is adequatebusiness as usual is that it leads to complacency
similarity among definitions to find commonand mediocrity, and over time such lack of
ground. Leadership has been conceived as theleadership can be costly and detrimental to the
exercise of influence, as a function of personality,organization. Napoleon offered his opinion about
as a mode of persuasion, as particular behaviors,the importance of leadership in his famous quip
as a means to achieve future visions, as anthat he would rather have an army of rabbits led
approach to induce commitment, as a creativeby a lion than an army of lions led by a rabbit.
mind set, as an achievement instrument, and as aMuch like in professional sports the need for
mixture of such conceptions.performance in today's competitive environment
Situational Theories of Leadershipdictates the notion of "doing it now or it is not for
The inability of researchers to recognizelong".
conclusively all the dimensions of leadershipWorks Cited
resulted in the development of four popularKotter, John. On What Leaders Really Do. Boston:
situational theories of leadership. These theoriesHarvard Business School Press, 1999.
propose that the most effective leadership styleErhard et al. "Integrity: A positive model that
depends upon situational variables, especially theincorporates the normative phenomena of
characteristics of the group and the nature of themorality, ethics, and legality". Negotiations,
task.Organizations and Markets (NOM) Working Paper
Hersey and Blanchard developed a "SituationalNo. 06-11; and Barbados Group Working Paper No.
Leadership" model that harmonized different03-06. SSRN, 2007.
combinations of task behavior and relationshipKotter, John. A Force For Change: How Leadership
behavior with the maturity of the followers.Differs From Management. New York: The Free
Depending on the readiness of the subordinates,Press, 1990.
the appropriate leadership style is first telling; thenScherr, Allen, Michael Jensen. "A new Model for
selling; then participating; and finally, for highlyLeadership". Negotiations, Organizations and
mature followers, delegating (Vecchio 334-350).Markets (NOM) Working Paper No. 06-10; and
The most extensively researched situationalBarbados Group Working Paper No. 02-06. SSRN,
leadership theory is Fred Fiedler's "Contingency2006.
Theory" of leadership. Fiedler used the LPC scaleAyman et al. "The Contingency Model of
to measure the leader's orientation toward eitherLeadership Effectiveness: Its Level of Analysis."
the task or the person. The most appropriateLeadership. Ed. Robert P. Vecchio. Indiana:
leadership style was then determined byUniversity of Notre dame Press, 2002.
assessing three situational variables: whether theVecchio, Robert. "Situational Leadership Theory:
relationships between the leader and theAn Examination of a Prescriptive Theory."
members were good or poor, whether the taskLeadership. Ed. Robert P. Vecchio. Indiana:
was structured or unstructured, and whether theUniversity of Notre dame Press, 2002.
power position of the leader was strong or weak.House et al. "Path Goal Theory of Leadership."
When these three situational variables created anLeadership. Ed. Robert P. Vecchio. Indiana:
extremely favorable or extremely unfavorableUniversity of Notre dame Press, 2002.
situation, the most effective leadership style wasVroom, Victor. "Can Leaders Learn to Lead."
a task-oriented (low LPC) leader. However, aLeadership. Ed. Robert P. Vecchio. Indiana:
leader with a high concern for interpersonalUniversity of Notre dame Press, 2002.
relationships (high LPC) was more effective inSternberg, Robert. "Managerial Intelligence: Why IQ
situations where there were intermediate levels ofIsn't Enough." Leadership. Ed. Robert P. Vecchio.
favorableness (Ayman et al. 351-377).Indiana: University of Notre dame Press, 2002.
The "Path Goal" model is another situationalEden, Dov. "Leadership and Expectations:
leadership theory. This theory is derived fromPygmalion Effects and other Self-Fulfilling
expectancy theory and suggests that effectiveProphecies in Organizations." Leadership. Ed. Robert
leaders must clarify the goal paths and increaseP. Vecchio. Indiana: University of Notre dame
the goal attractiveness for followers. Four distinctPress, 2002.
leadership styles are proposed in the model:Schein, E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership.
directive, supportive achievement-oriented andSan Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
participative leadership styles. The most