What is Effective Leadership?

What constitutes effective leadership? If you askpossible results from all the resources available to
ten people you'll probably get a variety ofhim or her, human and capital, by developing
answers. During my leadership developmentfocused commitment by all stakeholders on
programs we spend a great deal of time definingattainment of the primary vision.
what leadership means to the individuals in thePut plainly it means getting the best from
session.everyone and everything through commitment,
The simple fact is you can define it in manycommunications and buy -in.
ways, it almost becomes an individual preferenceNow ask yourself the question how many
of what each calls a great leader. That'smanagers or executives have you known or
understandable because different people respondworked with in your careers that fit this profile?
to different things.If you are like me it's down to just a few.
We begin by establishing the attributes ofThe bigger question is why can't you name more
effective leadership. We ask each participant tothan a few? If nearly all leadership traits are
think if a person that they consider to be a greatlearned, and well known to most of us, why
leader. We then ask them to list the mainaren't there more great leaders?
characteristics of that person that makes them aI can think of several ways to answer that
leader. We always get a variety of the samequestion based on my own experience.
answers:One is ego. People get put into a position of
Integrityauthority and ego takes over. They no longer
Great communicatorlisten to advice, facts, metrics or much of
Innovativeanything. They are the supreme leader, nobody
Intelligentcan tell them anything.
DecisiveAnother is fear. If I commit to a vision it might
And many more.not work so I'll allow the direction of the business
We then discuss each of these traits and decide ifto be decided for me.
their choice of leaders was born with that skill orStill another is commitment to results. Many
acquired it. The answer to everyone exceptexecutives confuse being busy with being
possibly native intelligence is they are acquiredproductive. They over schedule themselves in
skills. So the inference is made, 'leaders are mademeetings and micromanage every task. They are
not born"."too busy" doing what they feel comfortable
But a lot of people are smart and not greatdoing to do what needs doing.
leaders, or honest and not considered leaders,All of the patterns above lead to poor results.
what makes one person with those attributes aThose poor results are too often the only thing
leader and another not?that they delegate well, leading to morale issues,
If I look back at my career I can honestly say Iturnover, poor customer satisfaction and more
met hundreds if not thousands of managers, butpoor results.
a handful of people I would consider leaders. If IMy management career spans over thirty-five
were to try and define the difference from myyears and I learned many things good and bad
experience I would have to say leadership isfrom many people. One gentleman told me
certainly defined by getting positive results, butsomething early in my management career that
that's too narrow. I've known many managershas always stuck. "If you want to be a great
and executives that got positive results but wereleader give everyone else credit for the good
hated by their employees. I think it has to gothings and take the blame for all the bad things
further than that.that happen".
To me great leadership is getting the bestI don't know if it's that simple but it's a good start.