Why Does Project Management Fail?

"It must be remembered that projectDISCIPLINE - In the western world, people tend
management is first and foremost a philosophy ofto resist discipline because some believe it inhibits
management, not an elaborate set of tools andcreativity and personal freedom. As a result,
techniques. It will only be as effective as theteamwork is often sacrificed in favor of rugged
people who use it."individualism.
- Bryce's LawORGANIZATION - Pursuant to discipline is the
INTRODUCTIONproblem of organization. Again, in the western
I often run into companies who ask the simpleworld, people prefer to maintain their own identity
question, "Why can't we get our act together?and organize themselves to meet their needs as
Why does Project Management routinely fail inopposed to the needs of the organization. There
our company?" I do not believe a company'sare also those who claim, "A cluttered desk is the
overall problems in Project Management can besign of a brilliant mind." Hogwash. In contrast, I am
attributed to a specific tool or technique (althougha believer of the Navy's regimen whereby you
some certainly do not help matters). Instead, Ieither work on something, file it, or throw it away.
believe it is based on how important a companyThis forces people to get organized. If we need
considers Project Management to be. If theymore files, let's get them. A cluttered desk is a
believe it to be a vital part of the company'ssign of a disorganized person. Shape up, or ship
overall performance, it will be more successfulout.
than a company who considers it irrelevant. InACCOUNTABILITY - This is an area people tend
other words, I view Project Management asto rebel against themost. The approach to project
integral part of the corporate culture.management, as advocated by "PRIDE," ultimately
Let's consider the indicators of how a companyrepresents visibility and responsibility to produce
values Projectaccording to plan. Unfortunately, some people
Management:shun commitments and, instead, prefer to hide
- LACK OF KNOWLEDGE - employees simply lacktheir activity, thereby they cannot be measured
the basic knowledge of the mechanics of Projectand evaluated. This is typically the reaction of
Management. I do not run into too manypeople who are insecure. People who are
companies anymore with a total absence ofconfident in their abilities have no problem with the
knowledge in this regard. The conceptualaccountability issue.
foundation of Project Management has beenREACTIVE VS. ACTIVE MANAGEMENT
around for a number of years. There is aThe old adage, "If you do not make the decision,
multitude of training programs in Projectthe decision will be made for you," is valid. This
Management, both at the college and commercialalso sums up the difference between an active
level. There are also several discussion groups onand a reactive manager. True Project
the Internet and professional associations dealingManagement requires an "active" manager, not
with this subject (e.g., the Project Management"reactive." The active manager takes care of the
Institute of Newtown Square, PA). Hiring orproblems before they happen. They plan on the
contracting people with absolutely no knowledgefuture. The reactive manager deals with
of basic Project Management concepts isyesterday and waits until problems occur, then
becoming a rarity.tries to take care of them. Today, more and
- LACK OF ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY - themore IT organizations find themselves in a
company has not adopted a formal policy forconstant "firefighting" mode of operation. Why?
managing projects. Consequently, informal andBecause of a "reactive" management style. The
inconsistent approaches to project management"reactive" manager never seems to get ahead,
are used with mixed results. This is a much moreyet probably enjoys the highest visibility in the
common occurrence than finding a companycompany. As an aside, beware of your
devoid of knowledge in Project Management."firefighters," they are probably your chief
- LACK OF ENFORCEMENT OF POLICY ANDarsonists.
PROCEDURES - even though a policy has beenManagers don't wait for things to happen, they
established, it is not enforced. As a result,make things happen.
inconsistent results emerge. If a standard andHOW MUCH PROJECT MANAGEMENT IS
consistent approach to Project Management isNECESSARY?
devised by a company, it must be routinelyCan the philosophies of project management be
policed in order to assure accuracy and uniformadopted and implemented by a single group of
results. It is one thing to enact legislation, quitepeople for a single project? Yes. A department or
another to enforce it.division? Certainly. The entire company? Definitely.
- LACK OF CONSIDERATION FOR THEIn fact, as the scope grows, communications
MAGNITUDE AND COMPLEXITIES OF PROJECTimproves and the philosophy is more consistently
MANAGEMENT AND ATTACK IT IN PIECE MEALapplied.
- People seem to naturally underestimate theThe scope of project management affects many
magnitude of project management. For example,people:
project planning involves defining work breakdown- The individual worker will prepare estimates and
structures and dependencies which is a precursorschedules, perform project work, and report on
to estimating, planning, reporting and control;activities.
estimating is a prerequisite to scheduling; time- The project manager will plan and direct the use
reporting impacts project estimates andof resources on projects, and solve problems.
schedules; resource allocation is based on- Department managers will administer resources
availability of qualified people (skills inventory) andand control projects within an area.
current project schedules; etc. There is an- Executive management will establish project
overwhelming number of software packages onpriorities and monitor project progress.
the market attacking various aspects of ProjectObviously, project management should not be
Management, but very few addressing it is anrestricted to a handful of people or projects.
integrated whole.Dozens of projects may be active at any one
It must be remembered that projecttime, involving hundreds of workers across
management is first and foremost a philosophy ofdepartmental boundaries. Synchronization of the
management, not an elaborate set of tools andwork effort is required to maximize effect and
techniques, nor is it an administrative function.minimize confusion. Projectmanagement,
Rather, it is concerned with managing humantherefore, should be viewed as a corporate
beings towards the accomplishment of work (it isphilosophy as opposed to a technique used by a
a "people management" function). As such,select few. Only when a standard and consistent
project management will only be as effective asapproach to Project Management is adopted by a
thepeople who use it.company will it become an integral part of the
Ultimately, project management representscorporate culture. We will then hear less about
DISCIPLINE, ORGANIZATION, andwhy Project Management fails, and more of how
ACCOUNTABILITY; which are three areas peoplethe company is prospering.
seem to have a natural aversion to these days.